Reviews

— Show original

The waist size of the pants is quite narrow, I had to exchange size M for L (I weigh 82 kg for 1m80). The pants are well made, the fabric is solid and the seams are well done. Side ventilation is welcome for summer outings. The cut of the legs could be more fitted. The pants are pleasant to wear. I consider this to be a good quality item.

— Show original

Super comfortable, fitted and suitably stretchy riding pants and the price isn't bad either.

— Show original

Very comfortable pants, I recommend them

— Show original

Great pants. Light and like new, they also hold water.

— Show original

Having already used it for a few years, it is found to be working. Good ones don't oppress and stiffen. Size recommended. Minus the durability of the zippers. In the version of the previous model, the sepallu's vetskari broke. In this second model, so far, the pocket toilet has come out of place, but it has been fixed.

— Show original

Jummijammi are great pants for all kinds of cycling, they keep a bit of wind and are also comfortably ventilated. The design fits well without licking the skin. I would recommend it.

— Show original

In the style of Endura, there is no saving in the size of the logos. You should be a little calmer. M size too small, in L size the tightening of the belt loop is enough. I think you shouldn't overlap them a bit. Fortunately, the belt loops can be found. The ventilation openings are good and useful

— Show original

Very comfortable to wear. Blocks just enough wind.

— Show original

The pants have done well in hunting. The knee pads fit well underneath.

— Show original

They fit well and the knee pads fit well.

— Show original

Good pants

— Show original

Long and narrow model. 170 cm far S is ok in terms of length, but pretty tight at the waist. They feel comfortable, but I haven't had time to gain experience yet.

— Show original

Working bunnies. They are chilly in the frost, but they are not traded as winter trousers.

— Show original

Seated and comfortable with a pretty thick thigh. The so-called phone pocket is quite small and up, but yes, the basic smartphone is moderately comfortable.

— Show original

When you want the best choose Endura else you don't need cycling. the fifth star might have taken a bit of a slim / long dimension to the Finnish body

— Show original

Cheap good cycling pants

— Show original

Due to the price and good.

— Show original

Very satisfied greetings from Switzerland

— Show original

I think the previous Single track 1 version was perfect, this one is also good. The 1st version had a more durable fabric and elastics in the crotch and above the knees. Breathed better. cloth in summer. I think they were perfect pants for cross-country riding and then went to change the winning horse for another one. In the 2nd version, the fabric is flexible and they are ok to wear, but the wear resistance is worse, you can mostly notice it on the knees when you are servicing the bike and you are kneeling in the garage, so the 1st version lasted anything, this new fabric is not so durable. Probably the 1st version was too expensive to make and the materials were more expensive. It was clearly more complicated to sew with elastic seams. The new one has a better button fastening at the waist, similar to sprik's pants, there is a button on the inside in addition to the button on the front which is not visible in any of the pictures, so you don't need to be afraid of the only one button shown in the pictures that will loosen in use, there is another button below that is comfortable against the lower abdomen. Even this 2nd version is still a good pair of pants, especially at a discount. I would buy the first version as a spare, but I can't find it anywhere anymore.