OAC MIL 160 + EA 2.0

— Show original

They are well suited to forested and relatively flat terrain. These are not the most suitable choice for open terrain

— Show original

Previously tested a shorter model. Compared to expectations, no surprises. Suitably agile and capable. Directional stability hard, a little wobbly. I think it works best with slightly packed snow.

— Show original

Great ! Ultra simple assembly and very easy use for hiking

— Show original

A positive surprise, I don't miss monos at all.

— Show original

Good sliding snowshoes for the closed, but the lateral grip is weak. The calculation is possible as long as the slope is steep enough. As a rule, there is enough grip for vertical climbs. Ties are a minus, they squeak and squeak quite a lot, the choice of shoes affects this to some extent.

— Show original

I debated for a long time between the wider KAR 149 and the longer XCD GT 160 models. The combination of carrying capacity and skiability I was looking for was realized in this XCD BC 160 model, which to my great luck was also available in the right m05 design, suitable for the winter forest, instead of the flashy GT models. From forest skis, these are still a step towards snowshoes and a more walking style of skiing, but they are multi-purpose skis that are just right for hanging out in the backwoods, and even quite light. For long-distance skiing, however, it is worth choosing long skis without hair.

— Show original

So far, I've really enjoyed skiing in the woods with these.

— Show original

Excellent skis for mobile hunting in winter. A winter deer hunt or even a deer hunt goes through even denser bush when the driver is driving these!